Compare

Monetio vs the MQL5 Reliability score

Every MQL5 Signals page shows a Reliability percentage. The official help describes it only in general terms: it "evaluates in % the risks of this signal relative to others" and "considers profits, drawdowns, risks and many other criteria". The exact formula is not published.

What MQL5 Reliability is

A single relative score, built into the marketplace a signal is sold through. Forum discussion around the published formula fragments suggests it falls with a high deposit load and with very high monthly growth, and rises with moderate growth and load. It ranks a signal against other signals on the same platform; it is not an absolute measure, and it is not independent of the marketplace selling the signal.

FeatureMQL5 ReliabilityMonetio
Cost to checkFree, built into the signal pageFree tier reads the first 1,000 trades of any file; Plus and Pro read every trade
Independent of the marketplaceNo: scored by the platform selling the signalYes: no affiliation with any signal seller or broker
Grid or lot-escalation depthNot exposed as its own numberPer-level trade count and P&L, with a depth flag
Deposit-masked drawdownGrowth shown on a deposit basis; not separated from trading resultTime-weighted return alongside balance drawdown
Cost sensitivity for a subscriber on another brokerNot shownBreak-even spread per symbol, broker presets

Where MQL5 Reliability is the better choice

The Reliability score costs nothing to read, updates continuously as the signal trades, and sits next to growth, drawdown, subscriber count and every other number the signal page already shows, so there is no file to export. For a quick first look at a signal before deciding whether to dig further, it is the faster option.

Source: MetaTrader 5 help, "Signal monitoring", retrieved 2026-09-15.

Try Monetio on your own file